Treetop Forest

Statement of the problem The packaging team at Treetop woodland is experiencing many problems. Their productivity is decreasing and affecting the rest of the departments negatively. The unsupervised employees ar slack off, atomic number 18 non motivated and ar adopting norms that atomic number 18 not fitted with the company. Inventory cost and the risk of change stocks are also increasing. The reference of the way of the finished products is also decreasing, resulting in a loss in the market share in the industry, hence being unable to postulate with other companies.Cause of the problem Social loafing is create the decrease in productivity in the packaging team. This tendency to withhold strong-arm or intellectual effort when performing a company task1 represents the slacking behaviours of the employees in that department. The lack of supervision is also one of the of import causes of about of the problems stated. The sort outs cohesiveness is causing them to be hurt in sympathetic manners, as additive tasks, even though the behaviours adopted are not in line with the norms of the rest of the company (taking longer breaks etc).Because this departments location is further than all the other ones, the employees feel isolated and excluded from the company, causing their lack in motive. The groups poor performance is causing an overstock which results in high stock certificate costs and risk of damaged stocks since they have to be stored outside ultimately causing the poor appearance of the finished product which affects the buyers decision. It can be fancied that it is a larger group due to the tasks that need to be performed, which affects the group in many ways.In larger groups, friendships develop, participation decreases and disengagement increases resulting in process loss a group performance difficulty stemming from the problems of motivation and coordination in larger groups. 2 Solutions and Consequences 1. To counteract the social loaf ing the company should subjoin feelings of indispensability. Doing this within the group would motivate the employees. Increase performance feedback, so that employees go forth know how to improve themselves as well as knowing what they did well. pay group performance. Pros Highly motivated in what they are doing They would feel be to the company since they would know what the companys goals are. 2. To have a much structured environment, Treetop should hire and train a new supervisory program only for the packaging department. Pros This solution result decrease inventory costs and increase the production and quality of the finished products. Effective communication betwixt the other departments to balance the productivity levels Cons The salary and formulation of this new employee will increase the companys costs. 3.To reduce the overtime costs, limits should be frame on the essence of overtime hours an employee is allowed to use, along with a deadline for a circumst antial amount of products. Pros This would decrease the overtime salary costs This would increase productivity due to the fixed goals. This would decrease the extended break and lunch times. Cons Because these goals are imposed, the employees may be reluctant to achieve them. To avoid this situation, the goals could be discussed and then increasing the probability of their achievement. Recommended SolutionIt would be recommended to implant supervision since it is the main cause of all the problems the company is faced with and because of the many effects it would have on the situation. The group needs structure and a supervisor would wherefore help resolve most problems. Implemented Solution Immediately, communication should be improved amongst the departments to stop the unbalanced productivity. This would resolve part of the inventory costs problems. Upper management should also put someone in charge of the packaging team. If costs of hiring a new supervisor are too high, a n existing supervisor could be given more shifts.Although hiring and training costs are high, the company will benefit from this addition in the long-term. The new supervisor would counteract the social loafing the company is experiencing. The supervisor could be trained to focus on the motivation of his group (rewarding goodish performances etc). This supervisor is also the one who should limit the employees to a certain amount of overtime hours they are allowed to. The supervisor would reinforce the companys norms, in the end eliminating the self-imposed ones in the group (longer breaks). The supervisor would also promote group cohesiveness and a pleasant working environment.In the short term, amphetamine management could host a meeting or assembly between all departments to make them feel interrelated and important to the company. This could be a great motivation for the employees. In the long term, group evaluations could be undeniable to measure the groups performance and to see if the actions taken are resolving the problems. ________________________________________ 1 Johns,G, & Saks, A. M. (2008). Organizational Behaviour, 7th edition, Toronto Addison-Wesley-Longman. 2 Johns,G, & Saks, A. M. (2008). Organizational Behaviour, 7th edition, Toronto Addison-Wesley-Longman.